Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 3 days ago
Mark Geragos fired back at Nathan Hochman by calling his decision to move the resentencing appalling ... adding he's "abused the victims" both privately and publicly.

Category

People
Transcript
00:00The D.A. did file a motion to continue. I don't expect that his honor is going to grant that
00:10motion to continue. I do, however, think that it's appalling, for lack of a better term,
00:17how the D.A. has treated this case. By the way, Marcy's law, which is a constitutional
00:25law in the state of California, requires certain things of prosecutors and duties for victims.
00:33I don't know why, in this case, this particular D.A., because it certainly was not the last D.A.,
00:40but this particular D.A. has decided that he's got some other interest to vindicate that has nothing
00:46to do with the victims. There are people in this courtroom or will be in this courtroom that have
00:51been following these proceedings that have lived this case for 35 years. They're the victims. They
00:57have the unique situation of both being victims in this case and relatives of the defendants.
01:05Because of that unique nature, apparently the D.A. has said he gets a constitutional hall pass from
01:12doing anything regarding those victims, supporting those victims, notifying those victims, or anything
01:18else. He has abused the victims privately. He has abused them publicly. Just this last Friday,
01:26you were all here when they flashed grisly crime scene photos on the screen. I had to. In fact,
01:33it took me a second because normally it would be the D.A. who would jump up and object to that. Instead,
01:40it fell upon the defense to jump up and object to that. The D.A., to his credit, apologized. And then,
01:48you know what he did? He went and he organized a protest against the resentencing on Sunday morning
01:54while Terry Barrault was lying in a hospital after being found unconscious that morning on Sunday.
02:01I would ask you to ask the D.A. why at the last minute he does a Hail Mary filing of a motion to
02:07continue and does not notify any of the victims or the victim's lawyer. Why? What is going on? Whose
02:13interest is he vindicating? Who has he been taken hostage? Ask him those questions. Ask him if he's
02:20vindicating victims' rights, the public's rights, or if he's just trying to placate some disgruntled D.A.s
02:27in his own office for political purposes.

Recommended